The Global Warming hoax continues!

Hi Brit,

Apparently, not everyone on the planet has bought into the Global Warming hoax yet, so they’re putting out this: Satellite data vital to UN climate findings.  While I would be fine with the title, I would also question why the satellite data wasn’t vital to the previous findings.  Could it be because previous satellite data didn’t back up the Global Warming Theory and was thus discarded?

Anyway, even this bit of media biased reporting casts suspicion on the entire Global Warming scheme in its opening line, “The most authoritative report on climate change to date will be released tomorrow in Paris, France.”  If the previous reports were not “authoritative” then why, a rational person might ask, are we in a rush to base policy on them? 

Then we have this bit of scandal, “Predictions for the future of global warming in the report, intended as a summary for policymakers, are based on 19 computer models.”  I would point out that I can have you any number of computer models, within a month, that will show anything you want them to predict.  To verify the projections of these computer games, one has to wait until the date of the projection and take REAL MEASUREMENTS!  This is admitted in the next paragraph of the report, “The ability of satellites to deliver global data on the Earth System makes them particularly useful to study climate change and to validate and assess the quality of climate models.”

Then we have this twisted bit of misdirection, “Satellites are often the only means of studying the Earth’s Polar Regions because of their remoteness, darkness and cloudiness.”  Which makes me wonder how, considering that the greatest warming in the other IPCC reports occurred in the Arctic, was measured without the aid of this satellite data included in the latest report. 

Another interesting quote from the story is, “Satellites are useful for helping build scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions, such as methane — the second most important greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide. Using the Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) instrument aboard Envisat, researchers at the University of Heidelberg in 2005 were able to confirm increased methane concentrations induced mainly by human activities. ”  Which raises the question of why the 2001 report was presented in such a definitive manner if it wasn’t confirmed until four years later?  Of course, that delay, and the obvious agenda being pushed by these “scientists” brings anything they say after the initial report into doubt.

As a parting shot, allow me to present this:

A space-borne instrument known as a radar altimeter offers valuable information on the state of the ocean by providing measurements of the height of the ocean surface. Data acquired by radar altimeters aboard Envisat and ERS show sea levels have been rising by three mm a year since the early 1990s.

I would point out that the alarmist predictions of the initial IPCC report were of sea level rises of several feet, even hundreds of feet.  For the record, 3 mm is 0.11811 inches, so a hundred years at this rate is less than a foot.  Of course, one would have to question the ability of satellite measurements of a wave tossed ocean to have this level of accuracy.

the Grit

Advertisements

5 Responses to “The Global Warming hoax continues!”

  1. scanlyze Says:

    I posted a critical review and essay on the global warming-themed film, “An Inconvenient Truth”, starring Al Gore Jr. a few weeks back: Do several convenient half-truths make “An Inconvenient Truth”? on Scanlyze .

    Henry Edward Hardy

  2. britandgrit Says:

    Hi s,

    And that is a magnificent post. Good enough to put you on my, dang long, reading list and on our blogroll. Thanks.

    Did you notice that Gore is being nominated for the Nobel Peace prise for his propaganda film? I was going to post about that this morning, but Fox beat me to it 😉

    the Grit

  3. matt Says:

    burp

  4. Antibush Says:

    Bush is forever saying that democracies do not invade other countries and start wars. Well, he did just that. He invaded Iraq, started a war, and killed people. What do you think? Is killing thousands of innocent civilians okay when you are doing a little government makeover?
    Our country is in debt until forever, we don’t have jobs, and we live in fear. We have invaded a country and been responsible for thousands of deaths.
    We have lost friends and influenced no one. No wonder most of the world thinks we suck. Thanks to what george bush has done to our country during the past three years, we do!

  5. britandgrit Says:

    H A,

    Your recall of history fails you. We did not start the war with Iraq, Saddam did by invading Kuwait. The pause in hostilities after we kicked him out of that country was based on the treaty he signed. Iraq broke that treaty, which was more than sufficient reason to resume the conflict. However, in fairness, President Bush, who has apparently read the Constitution, although that document doesn’t seem to have been on your reading list, just to be safe, followed the proscribed procedure and, as only the Senate has the power to declare war, he put the matter to them and they passed it with a strong majority. Why do you think Hillary is trying so hard to explain her vote?

    As to killing innocent civilians, the current US military is the best ever in history at avoiding that. If you would bother to inform yourself about the facts of previous wars, the lack of civilian casualties in the current conflict would astonish you. For instance, compare what we did to Dresden to what is happening in Baghdad.

    As to our country’s debt, the vast majority of that is going to socialist social programs. I agree that these should be canceled. I’ve voted Republican on several occasions with the expectation that they would do just that. Unfortunately, we are still being sucked dry by these anti-American, and un-Constitutional, programs.

    As to jobs, at the moment we have the highest employment rate in the last several decades. Not only that, but we have the highest per capita income level, the highest growth rate in personal income, the …, well, we have the best economy in that the world has ever seen. I’m so sorry you got left out. Perhaps next time you will read the “help wanted” ads in your local paper.

    As to influencing people, I would point out that, while several other countries have experienced attacks from insane Muslim terrorists since 9/11, we have not. It would seem that our policy of kicking ass on any country sponsoring these nut cases has, indeed, influenced them.

    As to loosing friends, it is my opinion that any country which has not joined us in this global struggle against terrorism and fanatical religious aggression, were never our friends in any meaningful way. Thus, their loss is only a cosmetic problem which we are better for.

    Go do some research, ponder the facts you find, and get back to me.

    the Grit

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: