Hi Brit,
It seems that the Church of Global Warming should pick a High Priest to coordinate things.
On one hand we have, Congress eyes legislation to fight climate change (which I mentioned previously,) many countries are trying to implement the Kyoto Treats, and the EU is in the process of adding all sorts of new environmental laws.
On the other hand, we have, Climate Change Verdict: Science Debate Ends, Solution Debate Begins. While I contest the “Science debate ends” part, having posted about this several times in the recent past, I point out the “Solution debate begins” part, as it relates to what I just mentioned above. If there is still debate, even among the ranks of the faithful, as to what to do about Global Warming, then a rational person would have to question how our politicians can know what laws to pass to fix it? If they understand things better than the Climate Scientists on who’s’ knowledge rests the concept and proof of Global Warming, perhaps they should write the IPCC reports on the subject. Wait, sorry, I forgot, they did. Still, one would think that some scientific basis would be needed to formulate solutions to a real problem.
On the gripping hand, I found this, UTSA researchers examine effects of global warming on Antarctic. Now, call me crazy, but I thought this was “settled science,” and we know that the Antarctic ice is melting. So, a rational person must ask, why are we waisting money examining things we already know all about? Shouldn’t those funds be going to find a solution to Global Warming, or at least to implementing the solutions the politicians already seem to know about?
I have to say, Global Warming fanatics, y’all really should anoint a High Priest in an effort to get your act together. How about AlGore?
the Grit